Supabase vs Firebase Hosting

Head-to-head, indicative as of Oct 2026. Prices change — always confirm on the vendor page.

Verdict

Quick read: pick Supabase if your workload is postgres, auth, storage without a backend team and its included egress fits your traffic shape; pick Firebase Hosting if you need web apps already using firebase auth/db. For anything latency-sensitive at the edge, cold start row is the tiebreaker.

Side by side

SupabaseFirebase Hosting
TypePostgres platform + authFrontend + CDN (Google)
Free tier2 projects, 500MB DB10GB storage, 360MB/day transfer
Paid pricing (indicative)Pro from $25/moBlaze pay-as-you-go
EgressIncluded allowancesMetered beyond free
Cold startN/AMinimal (CDN)
RegionsMulti-regionGoogle edge network
Best forPostgres, auth, storage without a backend teamWeb apps already using Firebase auth/DB

Where to start

Try Supabase Try Firebase Hosting

Related reading

Error debug library · Hardware build guides · DevOps blog

NinjaOps publishes free engineering guides. Some outbound links are affiliate links: they cost you nothing and support the site.

Last reviewed 2026-10-02 · NinjaOps SEO grid · DevOps blog